One thing that draws me to N. T. Wright as a scholar is that
he is both a judicious historian and a sharp theologian. In his book The Challenge of Jesus,
Wright skillfully intertwines both as he presents a strong case for
re-evaluating common notions of Jesus from a historical perspective allowing
that to shape our theology. Christians
often read the gospel accounts as theological treatises to answer questions
posed by skeptics (i.e. “Is there a god?
If so, who is he?” to which Christians replied “Jesus is God.” which is
a response that the accounts weren’t intended to provide). This book will help inform them as to Jesus’
place in the narrative of Scripture.
On the other hand, skeptics and historians (aka “questers”) have a difficult time giving
credence to the gospel accounts scenario of events along with 2nd temple
Judaism. They run the risk of presenting
Jesus in a completely unacceptable fashion for Christians to accept. Thus you have the great divide.
What is most remarkable is that Wright does this on a laymen’s
level in this book. However, I’ve read
many other books by Wright wherein he repeats much of the same things at
different depths and levels. For
example, he covers in a very brief manner some of the most important points
brought out in his Origins of Christianity series. And he later re-emphasizes some of these
points in one of his latest books, How God Became King. So there is a lot of overlap in regards to
Wright and his presentation to Jesus.
Each one is great, but it is not necessary to read all of them to have
an adequate understanding of his views.
I would recommend starting with Challenge if you want to enter the fray. If your interest in this kind of presentation
to Jesus is piqued, then move on to some of his other books. If you are really wanting to be challenged by
Wright’s writings, then move on to his Origins series. Ironically, I read him in the exact opposite
order to what I am recommending. So I’d
like to think that if read the way I am encouraging, you will only increase in
your understanding of his presentation instead of continually reading
summations of them as I did.
Either way, I highly recommend this book as a good distillation
(the word my pastor used to describe this book) of Wright’s understanding of
the Israel story and Jesus’ relationship to it.
Wright will increase your understanding of the Bible’s grand narrative
and its great continuity between the testaments. It will make sense from a historical
perspective why Jesus was executed. You
will see how his actions were meant to be seen as highly symbolic reinterpretation
of the OT Israel story played out in the final Exodus of God’s people. I encourage readers of all levels to read
this as an introduction to Wright. I am
assuming most in the scholarly field have already been exposed to Wright, so I
would encourage you to read it as a synopsis of what you know of Wright already. No matter what, read it!
1 comment:
Wondering if you read "Unfolding the Mystery" by Edmund P. Clowney.
Post a Comment